🚀 go-pugleaf

In <809@taniwha.UUCP> paul@taniwha.UUCP (Paul Campbell) writes:

>PS: for those who don't know even the revised report contains ambiguity,
>the most common example is:

>	union([]int , struct (int a, b, c)) fred = (1,2,3);

Not so. For this to be allowed, "(1,2,3)" would have to be a
	strong-UNITED-unit		[4.4.1.c,d,5.2.1.c]
where 'UNITED' is the particular union in question.
This, in turn, would have to be a
	strong-UNITED-ENCLOSED-clause	[3.2.1.d,5.1.A,B,C,D]
or, more specifically, a
	strong-UNITED-collateral-clause	[1.2.2.A]
BUT, there is no such animal		[3.3.1.d,e]

The point is that ENCLOSED-clauses cannot be coerced (you can only coerce
the things inside them).