🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #3643

Re: Optional static typing limits

#3643
From: David Gudeman
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 1991 17:25
25 lines
1307 bytes
In article  <1991Apr22.153149.8082@newcastle.ac.uk> Chris Holt writes:
]What would be nice would be something of the form
]
]Sort S <=
]    where
]    S : sequence of D
]    D : domain
]    <= : partial_order (D x D -> boolean)
]        where
]        partial_order : transitive & reflexive & antisymmetric

I know that is the standard solution, but I wonder if a better
solution wouldn't be a function $ord : D -> Int$ that maps domain
objects into arbitrary integers with the property that if $d1 < d2$
by the partial order, then $ord(d1) < ord(d2)$.  ($d1 < d2$ means that
$d1 <= d2$ and $d1 =/= d2$.)

You would lose the partial order with this function (so you might want
to implement <= anyway), but it seems that $ord$ has more general
uses.  It works for a wider variety of sorting methods, for example,
and could also be used for a hash function.
--
					David Gudeman
gudeman@cs.arizona.edu
noao!arizona!gudeman
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2325@optima.cs.arizona.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!arizona!gudeman

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!arizona!gudeman
From: gudeman@cs.arizona.edu (David Gudeman)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Optional static typing limits
Message-ID: <2325@optima.cs.arizona.edu>
Date: 23 Apr 91 17:25:16 GMT
Sender: news@cs.arizona.edu
Lines: 25