🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <BxMCxA.3nM@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> hrubin@pop.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) writes:
   If you could write 

   define	(x ++ y) x+y+1

   I would accept that as the insertion of the ++ operator.

Ah, so now that your given an example of a language in which you can
do the desired operation, you complain about the syntax!  How about
the following :-

 infix 0 ++

 x ++ y = x+y+1


Note 1. I've arbitrarily chosen the associativity and precedence as
        you didn't state any preference.
     2. "++" is already defined in Haskell, so you'd need to explicitly
	override the default definition, this would be done at the
	module level.

bevan