🚀 go-pugleaf

In article  <1991Jun26.223026.13792@watserv1.waterloo.edu> Michael Coffin writes:
]There's at least one advantage to the lisp syntax, and that advantage
]is important to lispers, although others may not find it important.
]Lisp programs have a simple, logical representation as data within
]lisp: a program is a list of lists, i.e., a tree.

I'll agree that that would be a huge advantage if it were only
possible with lisp syntax.  But in prolog you can do anything that you
can do with lisp syntax, and prolog uses mostly conventional
function-call and operator syntax.

And I understand (from reading, not first-hand experience) that there
are some languages that have even improved on prolog in this area.
--
					David Gudeman
gudeman@cs.arizona.edu
noao!arizona!gudeman