Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #4365Re: Readable Perl (was: Re: Relative Speed of Perl vs. Tcl vs. C)
From: Stephen P Potter
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 05:13
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 1996 05:13
39 lines
1676 bytes
1676 bytes
In article <4g0drdINN167@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku) writes: None of the above, bud. I find this readable for x in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ; do echo "I can count to" $x done followed by, in second place: x=1 while [ ! "$x" = "11" ] ; do echo "I can count to" $x : $(( x += 1 )) done ...and third place: ... movl $1, %edx loop: pushl %edx movl $message, %eax pushl %eax call _printf inc %edx cmpl $10, %edx jae loop ... message .ascii "I can count to %d\n\0" Ummm... oh forget it. It isn't worth going there. -spp -- Stephen P Potter Pencom Systems Administration Beaching It spp@psa.pencom.com Pager: 1-800-759-8888, 547-9561 Work: 703-860-2222 "I don't care whether people actually like Perl, just so long as they *think* they like it... ;-)" -Larry Wall
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<SPP.96Feb16001342@syrinx.hideout.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news1.radix.net!sppReferences:
<4e3a2u$eoa@wcap.centerline.com> <4fncgf$96e@solutions.solon.com> <JTV2J.96Feb12142743@mamba.cs.virginia.edu> <ukd97hwzkc.fsf_-_@linda.teleport.com> <4g0drdINN167@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news1.radix.net!spp From: spp@syrinx.hideout.com (Stephen P Potter) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.java Subject: Re: Readable Perl (was: Re: Relative Speed of Perl vs. Tcl vs. C) Date: 16 Feb 1996 05:13:42 GMT Organization: RadixNet Internet Services Message-ID: <SPP.96Feb16001342@syrinx.hideout.com> References: <4e3a2u$eoa@wcap.centerline.com> <4fncgf$96e@solutions.solon.com> <JTV2J.96Feb12142743@mamba.cs.virginia.edu> <ukd97hwzkc.fsf_-_@linda.teleport.com> <4g0drdINN167@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> Reply-To: spp@pencom.com NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin23.annex1.radix.net In-reply-to: c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca's message of 15 Feb 1996 14:58:53 -0800