🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #4370

Re: Readable Perl (was: Re: Relative Speed of Perl vs. Tcl vs. C)

#4370
From: Jiri Baum
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 01:14
66 lines
3043 bytes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Jan-Pieter Cornet (johnpc@xs4all.nl) wrote:
... [discussion about best readable language] ...
> No, you got it all totally wrong. I think this is the best readable
> (in Tri-INTERCAL):
...
[INTERCAL code snipped - 43 lines to count to 10 nicely]
...
> Anyone else will simply be too scared to touch this code. So you can be
> pretty sure nobody changes it behind your back.
...

I report changing it to count to 15, but I guess that's a trivial change.
Similarly boring is to have it get the limit from stdin...

...
> In fact, you can be pretty sure you won't change it either after you
> wrote it, because you will probably have forgotten how the program
> works 5 minutes after you wrote it. So any luser nagging for extra
> features afterwards, is SOL.
...

Could you change it to count in decimal? Please? Pretty please?

...
> The other major advantage is... the above code took me about 3 hours
> to write. Compare this to the 10 to 30 seconds it takes to write a
...

And making one that counts in decimal is likely to take much longer still.
 
...
> PS: this article contains some strange usage of the words "best readable"
> that you probably weren't previously aware of :)
...

One thing I like about INTERCAL (any variant) is that it's the only
language I can think of where a program may legally have the words
			DON'T PANIC
at the top in large friendly letters.


...
> Linux -- "It's computing, Jim, but not as we know it"
...

Hmm, I wonder if the same goes for INTERCAL :-)


Jiri
- --                                                              /-----\
<jirib@cs.monash.edu.au>                                       |   |   |
<jiri@melb.dialix.oz.au>                                       |   |   |
PGP 463A14D5 (normal key)                                      |  /    |
PGP EF0607F9 (low security key)                                 \-----/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i

iQCVAwUBMTOsaixV6mvvBgf5AQE3OgP/VIF0oiBMDkTKGCY63oTdWUEdqEBVbKqQ
AEjo2GkWgmngd/TykaCyWEfy2YcqW6bZhI8RJLpYCCAlg9UEljsUgqFIJc8tbvui
LUhDIAGw+CxMInGcQmgBFTi/LLoCzJJZec3xtL3TUSNmDq3k2QQbABQoosYCJLx8
NASIlVSsfJU=
=ucZl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4h0aa3$dpl@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!not-for-mail
References: <4e3a2u$eoa@wcap.centerline.com> <ukd97hwzkc.fsf_-_@linda.teleport.com> <4gb3kp$lu7@gaia.ns.utk.edu> <4ge7bk$4vq@news.ox.ac.uk> <4gtr64$s7h@news.xs4all.nl>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bruce.cs.monash.edu.au!not-for-mail
From: jirib@bruce.cs.monash.edu.au (Jiri Baum)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.java,alt.lang.intercal
Subject: Re: Readable Perl (was: Re: Relative Speed of Perl vs. Tcl vs. C)
Followup-To: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.java,alt.lang.intercal
Date: 28 Feb 1996 01:14:43 GMT
Organization: Monash University
Message-ID: <4h0aa3$dpl@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au>
References: <4e3a2u$eoa@wcap.centerline.com> <ukd97hwzkc.fsf_-_@linda.teleport.com> <4gb3kp$lu7@gaia.ns.utk.edu> <4ge7bk$4vq@news.ox.ac.uk> <4gtr64$s7h@news.xs4all.nl>
NNTP-Posting-Host: molly.cs.monash.edu.au
X-NNTP-Posting-User: jirib
X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950823BETA PL0]