Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #4455Re: assembly programming prefereable to HLL programming ?
From: Silver
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1986 06:56
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1986 06:56
16 lines
1276 bytes
1276 bytes
I think the key to being able to conveniently write assembly code lies
in a really bitching macro facility, with the general approach being
'define whatever wierd constructs using the macro expander, but,
because YOU are supplying the underlying code, you can make it as
efficient as you want'. Now, the program is not necessarily
non-portable, just the macro code. Since most of the macro routines
are not too complex when singled out, it's easier to rewrite.
Silver.
uucp: ...!topaz!gaynor ...!topaz!remus!gaynor
arpa: gaynor@topaz silver@gold
Disclaimer: This posting contains the authors two cents, not the two
cents of anybody else (they might notice the shortage).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7633@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!topaz!gaynorReferences:
<646@instable.UUCP> <476@atari.UUcp> <8@blipyramid.BLI.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!topaz!gaynor From: gaynor@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Silver) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: assembly programming prefereable to HLL programming ? Message-ID: <7633@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> Date: Tue, 9-Dec-86 01:56:05 EST Article-I.D.: topaz.7633 Posted: Tue Dec 9 01:56:05 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 9-Dec-86 05:56:32 EST References: <646@instable.UUCP> <476@atari.UUcp> <8@blipyramid.BLI.COM> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 15 Cc: gaynor