Re: Choosing between C++ and Objective-C

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #4638

#4638

From: michael
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1987 20:07

8 lines
896 bytes

A couple of years ago when I was comparing the two, I choose C++ over
Objective-C because the latter had a significant execution-time
overhead to support dynamic object binding and a syntax that less
resembled standard C.  It was easier to think of C++ being a dialect
of C that could now contain function declaration or defintions as
structure elements.

You should check to see if my first point is still valid.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <867@orcisi.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!syntron!orcisi!michael

References: <786@idec.stc.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!syntron!orcisi!michael
From: michael@orcisi.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Choosing between C++ and Objective-C
Message-ID: <867@orcisi.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Feb-87 15:07:42 EST
Article-I.D.: orcisi.867
Posted: Mon Feb  2 15:07:42 1987
Date-Received: Mon, 2-Feb-87 18:43:41 EST
References: <786@idec.stc.co.uk>
Organization: Optical Recording Corporation, Toronto, Ontario
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message