Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #4783Re: Recognising QUOTE deemed harmful to EVAL's laziness
From: Drew Adams
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1987 12:23
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1987 12:23
70 lines
2857 bytes
2857 bytes
Further References
------------------
I neglected to mention that the idea that QUOTE is properly treated
as a constructor (in a reduction setting) is due to Alan Robinson.
Thanks to Jan Prins for reminding me.
Here's the paper where he discusses denotation vs. reduction with
respect to quote. I don't know of a more recent one.
%T New Generation Knowledge Processing
%A J. A. ROBINSON
%R First Annual Progress Report
%I Syracuse University
%C Syracuse, New York
%D December 1984
That paper introduces the "unknown-tolerant" fully lazy functional
logic language SUPER being developed at Syracuse University. The
essential reference dealing with the functional basis of SUPER is:
%T A Fully Lazy Higher Order Purely Functional Programming Language
with Reduction Semantics
%A Kevin J. GREENE
%I Syracuse University
%C Syracuse, New York
%D August 1985
%O Ph.D. Thesis
Thanks also to Stan Shebs for reminding me of Brian Smith's work on
3-LISP, which (among other things) is another attempt to clean up the
semantics of quotation (and more). Here are two accessible
references.
%T The Implementation of Procedurally Reflective Languages
%A Jim des RIVIERES
%A Brian Cantwell SMITH
%B ACM Symposium on LISP and Functional Programming
%C Austin, Texas
%I ACM
%P 331-347
%D August 6-8, 1984
%T Reflection and Semantics in Lisp
%A Brian Cantwell SMITH
%B Eleventh Annual ACM Symposium on Principles
of Programming Languages (POPL)
%C Salt Lake City, Utah
%I ACM
%P 23-35
%D January 15-18, 1984
In case some who read this didn't see Stan's message, here is part:
"His basic point of view is that quoting is important to
distinguish levels of meta-ness, and so quoted objects
are promoted to first-class types known as handles.
There are operations UP and DOWN that add and remove
handles, since evaluation does not; (eval '2) => '2.
Also, (+ 2 '3) is an semantic error, like taking the car
of an number.
In other words, Smith also uses an essentially *reducing* EVAL,
separating out a separate denotation mechanism.
--
Drew ADAMS, Laboratoires de Marcoussis, Centre de Recherche de la Compagnie
Generale d'Electricite, Route de Nozay, 91460 MARCOUSSIS, FRANCE
Tel. 64.49.11.54, adams@crcge1.cge.fr
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2718@crcge1.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mcvax!inria!crcge1!adamsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mcvax!inria!crcge1!adams From: adams@crcge1.UUCP (Drew Adams) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.lisp Subject: Re: Recognising QUOTE deemed harmful to EVAL's laziness Message-ID: <2718@crcge1.UUCP> Date: Thu, 23-Jul-87 08:23:54 EDT Article-I.D.: crcge1.2718 Posted: Thu Jul 23 08:23:54 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Jul-87 11:58:58 EDT Lines: 70 Keywords: reduction, quotation, LISP, evaluation