🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1971@tekig5.TEK.COM> tomm@tekig5.UUCP (Tom Milligan) writes:
>
>Both Objective-C and C++ are C language Preprocessors.  Thus the capablility

    Sorry, no.  Objective-C is indeed a preprocessor, but C++ is a C superset
and the C++ 'program' is actually a *compiler* for the language C++.  It
is C++ (specifically the 'cfront' pass) that does the syntactic and semantic
analysis.

>exists in both to write "standard" C code.  And both produce as their output,
>"standard" C code.  Both provide extenstions to the C language to support the 

   The release version of C++ does happen to use your existing C compiler
as a code-generator.  However, the output from C++ is a C-language version
of the internal parse tree, ie new code, not the old code with the C++
extensions translated.   I understand that the C++ compiler used internally
at Bell Labs bypasses this step.

>and that this makes things un-unified is bogus.  There are only C structures 
>in both C++ and Objective-C.
     Maybe in terms of the structures, perhaps.  But in terms of what
  a program in the language *looks* like, C++ is far more unified.  I think
  Objective-C does far more violence to the syntax of C than does C++.
-- 
 Alastair JW Mayer     BIX: al
                      UUCP: ...!utzoo!dciem!nrcaer!cognos!geovision!alastair

 "What we really need is a good 5-cent/gram launch vehicle."