🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1579@pdn.UUCP> bob@pdn.UUCP (Bob Hickle) writes:
/In article <1549@pdn.UUCP>, bob@pdn.UUCP (me) writes:
/> representation of the internal parse tree.  Anyway, I believe (but may
/> be wrong here) that the Objective-C compiler also compiles the ordinary
/> C code in an Objective-C program.  It just happens to produce output
/> which is the same C code.  That does not mean that it has not been
/> compiled (ie. parsed, syntax checked, etc).
/
/Well, I was right in that I may be wrong.
/
/Jonathan Shopiro (AT&T Bell Labs) suggested that I try to compile the
/following program with the Objective-C compiler and figure out where
/the error message comes from.
/
/-------------------------------
/int	f();
/
/main()
/{
/	int	i = f;
/}
/-------------------------------
/
/I tried it and determined that the Objective-C compiler has nothing bad
/to say about this program.  It appears to pass it through (and prepends
/some header stuff on the front).  The C compiler of course complains
/about the assignment statement.
/
/So my previous statement that the Objective-C compiler 'compiles'
/ordinary C code in an Objective-C program was wrong.  Thats what I
/get for making claims without fully verifying them first.
/------------------------------------------------------------------------
/Bob Hickle				Paradyne Corporation
/{gatech,codas,ucf-cs}!usfvax2!pdn!bob	Mail stop LF-207
/Phone: (813) 530-2664			8550 Ulmerton Road, PO Box 2826
/					Largo, FL  34641
/

Not so fast, Bob. You should ask me first before rushing off to proclaim
your imperfections on linguistic matters.  It is not necessarily true
that Objective-C is not "compiling" the program fragment in your
example.  What your example does prove is that semantic analysis
(which usually amounts to type-checking) is not being performed.
Semantic analysis is not a requirement for a compiler (the Smalltalk
compiler doesn't do it, for example).

--alan@pdn