Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #5216Re: From Modula to Oberon
From: Dennis M. O'Connor
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 1988 22:28
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 1988 22:28
20 lines
1323 bytes
1323 bytes
It's difficult to see the logic in using Modula2 if
a reliable Ada(R) compiler is available. This is
precisely my situation : I use Modula2 as a "poor
man's Ada", on my Amiga. Not that it isn't okay,
but Ada leaves Modula2 far behind.
Oberon seems to be a "poor man's Modula2", which
I guess makes it a "welfare Ada" :-) I see no
use for Oberon. With the ever-increasing availablity
of "standard" C, Ada, Common Lisp, and yes Modula2,
it has no unique problem domain in which it excels
by enough of a margin to make it worth the hassle
that is ALWAYS involved in using a new language.
Sad what can happen when famous intellectuals try
to recapture their glory days, isn't it :-)
--
Dennis O'Connor oconnor%sungod@steinmetz.UUCP
ARPA: OCONNORDM@ge-crd.arpa
(-: The Few, The Proud, The Architects of the RPM40 40MIPS CMOS Micro :-)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9796@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!sunset!oconnorReferences:
<2787@enea.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!steinmetz!sunset!oconnor From: oconnor@sunset.steinmetz (Dennis M. O'Connor) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: From Modula to Oberon Message-ID: <9796@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> Date: 4 Mar 88 22:28:41 GMT References: <2787@enea.se> Sender: news@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP Reply-To: oconnor%sungod@steinmetz.UUCP Organization: GE Corporate R&D Center Lines: 20 Keywords: Ada, Modula, Oberon