Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #5450Yields clause in CLU
From: news
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1988 07:43
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 1988 07:43
4 lines
621 bytes
621 bytes
Why is the "Yields" clause in the iterator abstraction in CLU optional. This means that I can write an iterator abstraction that is not meant to return any object, but rather for its side-effect. Isn't that contradictory with the idea of an iterator abstraction?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11958@santra.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!enea!tut!santra!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!mcvax!enea!tut!santra!news From: news@santra.UUCP (news) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Yields clause in CLU Message-ID: <11958@santra.UUCP> Date: 14 Apr 88 07:43:34 GMT Reply-To: nbo@hut.UUCP (Nassim Bouteldja) Organization: Helsinki University of Technology Lines: 4 Keywords: Iterator abstraction, CLU, ADT