Re: Threatening Pascal Loops

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #5480

#5480

From: Barry Margolin
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 1988 22:44

14 lines
1122 bytes

In article <3401@omepd> bobdi@omepd.UUCP (Bob Dietrich) writes:
>Just to be clear, there is only one official standard for Pascal right now,
>embodied in the ANSI/IEEE and ISO standards.

That's TWO official standards, since the ANSI Pascal standard and the
ISO standard are not equivalent.  I don't even think one is a subset
of the other.  I think they differ incompatibly in a couple of areas,
although I don't know what they are offhand.

Barry Margolin
Thinking Machines Corp.

barmar@think.com
uunet!think!barmar

Technical Details

Message-ID: <20085@think.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!necntc!ima!think!barmar

References:

<2827@enea.se> <1557@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <2773@mmintl.UUCP> <294@tmsoft.UUCP> <11047@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <3364@omepd> <11369@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <3401@omepd>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!necntc!ima!think!barmar
From: barmar@think.COM (Barry Margolin)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: Threatening Pascal Loops
Message-ID: <20085@think.UUCP>
Date: 21 Apr 88 22:44:44 GMT
References: <2827@enea.se> <1557@pasteur.Berkeley.Edu> <2773@mmintl.UUCP> <294@tmsoft.UUCP> <11047@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <3364@omepd> <11369@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <3401@omepd>
Sender: usenet@think.UUCP
Reply-To: barmar@fafnir.think.com.UUCP (Barry Margolin)
Organization: Thinking Machines Corporation, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 13

Reply to Parent Message