🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #5628

Re: Pascal vs. Algol (Was: Algol 60 vs Algol 68 (was "stack machines (Burroughs)"))

#5628
From: David Keppel
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 1988 00:42
22 lines
1646 bytes
In article <961@gethen.UUCP> isaac@gethen.UUCP (Isaac Rabinovitch) writes:
>The main reason Pascal is so popular today is the same reason BASIC is:
>micro programmers were hungry for high-level (relatively) languages, and
>vendors addressed the marketplace by adapting teaching tools.

I would claim different: that the reasons that PASCAL are (was) so
popular include:
+ Simplicity: can be implemented reliablly.
+ Simplicity: can be understood effectively.
+ Quality: The language had years of thinking in it before it came
  into an implementation.
+ Straightforward: A compiler can do little optimization and produce
  good code.
+ Defintion: There is a good standard to adhere to.

I think that these reasons (and others) are responsible for the
vendors' choice of Pascal over Xyz.  I'm not claiming that there
aren't problems with Pascal, there are many.  As Issac (or somebody)
pointed out, Wirth designed it as an EDUCATIONAL language; it is an
accident of its careful design that it became so popular.

	;-D on  ( C++ is the Fortran of the 90's )  Pardo
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5195@june.cs.washington.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-june!pardo
References: <1521@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <1532@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <476@pcrat.UUCP> <130@quintus.UUCP> <961@gethen.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!ames!ll-xn!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!uw-june!pardo
From: pardo@june.cs.washington.edu (David Keppel)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Pascal vs. Algol (Was: Algol 60 vs Algol 68 (was "stack machines (Burroughs)"))
Message-ID: <5195@june.cs.washington.edu>
Date: 29 Jun 88 00:42:27 GMT
References: <1521@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <1532@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <476@pcrat.UUCP> <130@quintus.UUCP> <961@gethen.UUCP>
Reply-To: pardo@uw-june.UUCP (David Keppel)
Organization: U of Washington, Computer Science, Seattle
Lines: 21