Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #5852Re: COBOL -> C converter
From: Dave Yearke
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 1988 17:27
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 1988 17:27
14 lines
1046 bytes
1046 bytes
In article <sXQJHoy00VQa02-Goq@andrew.cmu.edu> jl3j+@andrew.cmu.edu (John Robert Leavitt) writes: > [...] And you ARE rigth that converting COBOL to any Algol descended >language may be kludgy, but... > >Is is the Algol-based language's fault? Or is it COBOL's fault? Why does it have to be either one's fault? Personally, I'm a believer in different languages for different purposes. -- Dave Yearke, Sigma Systems Technology, Inc. 5813 Main St, Williamsville, NY 14221 ...!sunybcs!sigmast!dgy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<693@sigmast.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!bionet!apple!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!sunybcs!canisius!sigmast!dgyReferences:
<sXQJHoy00VQa02-Goq@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-tis!helios.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!agate!bionet!apple!bloom-beacon!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!ncar!boulder!sunybcs!canisius!sigmast!dgy From: dgy@sigmast.UUCP (Dave Yearke) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: COBOL -> C converter Message-ID: <693@sigmast.UUCP> Date: 7 Nov 88 17:27:08 GMT References: <sXQJHoy00VQa02-Goq@andrew.cmu.edu> Reply-To: dgy@sigmast.UUCP (Dave Yearke) Organization: Sigma Systems Technology, Inc., Buffalo NY Lines: 13