Algol 68 (was Re: Why have FORTRAN 8x at all?)

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #5877

#5877

From: Richard A. O'Keefe
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 1988 08:13

9 lines
1052 bytes

In article <591@tuck.nott-cs.UUCP> anw@maths.nott.ac.uk (Dr A. N. Walker) writes:

>"Very few implementations finished" -- well, not exactly.  The current (and
>	last [:-(]) Algol Bulletin lists 7 *current* implementations "which
>	you can actually obtain and use", running on at least 20 different

Would there be one for Suns (especially Sun-386i)?  I used to use Algol 68
on a DEC-10, and would dearly love to be able to use a nice clean language
again.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <710@quintus.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!sun!quintus!ok

References: <388@ubbpc.UUCP> <16187@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <599@quintus.UUCP> <392@ubbpc.UUCP> <591@tuck.nott-cs.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!clyde!att!osu-cis!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!purdue!decwrl!sun!quintus!ok
From: ok@quintus.uucp (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Algol 68 (was Re: Why have FORTRAN 8x at all?)
Message-ID: <710@quintus.UUCP>
Date: 19 Nov 88 08:13:59 GMT
References: <388@ubbpc.UUCP> <16187@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <599@quintus.UUCP> <392@ubbpc.UUCP> <591@tuck.nott-cs.UUCP>
Sender: news@quintus.UUCP
Reply-To: ok@quintus.UUCP (Richard A. O'Keefe)
Followup-To: comp.lang.misc
Organization: Quintus Computer Systems, Inc.
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message