🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #5903

Re: Algol-68 down for the count (was: Why have FORTRAN 8x at all?)

#5903
From: Martyn Thomas
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 1988 10:41
16 lines
1365 bytes
Praxis still uses Algol 68, for real product development.  We compile
through the SD-SCICON Algol 68 compiler for VAX systems, and through our own
compiler to C for Suns and other UNIX systems.

ICL supply Algol 68 as a standard product to run on VME.  We can
supply for Honeywell Multics, if anyone is still running it!

The Royal Signals and Radar Establishment have a compiler for FLEX (their
capability machine), and for Ten15 (their abstract machine).  

A new implementation for any reasonable architecture should cost less than
#500,000 (UK pounds), starting from the RS front-end.  We are happy to bid
for such implementation contracts!

Martyn Thomas, Praxis plc, 20 Manvers Street, Bath BA1 1PX UK.
Tel:	+44-225-444700.   Email:   ...!uunet!mcvax!ukc!praxis!mct 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3373@newton.praxis.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stc!praxis!hilbert!mct
References: <388@ubbpc.UUCP> <16187@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <599@quintus.UUCP> <591@tuck.nott-cs.UUCP> <404@ubbpc.UUCP> <1916@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!mcvax!ukc!stc!praxis!hilbert!mct
From: mct@praxis.co.uk (Martyn Thomas)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Algol-68 down for the count (was: Why have FORTRAN 8x at all?)
Summary: Down but not out
Message-ID: <3373@newton.praxis.co.uk>
Date: 23 Nov 88 10:41:58 GMT
References: <388@ubbpc.UUCP> <16187@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <599@quintus.UUCP> <591@tuck.nott-cs.UUCP> <404@ubbpc.UUCP> <1916@crete.cs.glasgow.ac.uk>
Sender: news@praxis.co.uk
Reply-To: mct@praxis.co.uk (Martyn Thomas)
Organization: Praxis Systems plc, Bath, UK
Lines: 16