🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <3290002@hpctdls.HP.COM> rbk@hpctdls.HP.COM (Richard Katz) writes:
>>/ hpctdls:comp.lang.misc / phil@uxg.cso.uiuc.edu /  2:36 pm  Dec 20, 1988 /
>
>>How did the := come into being in languages like Algol, Pascal, and Ada?
>
>I don't know how the := came into being, but I don't have any beef
>about it.  In fact, I think Pascal use of it is good.  Pascal uses =
>as a boolean operator and := as asignment.

Why not think of the ":=" versus "=" question as a choice of whether
or not to support operator overloading in the language.  The "=" for 
assignment is a procedure, while the boolean operator is a function.

Whether or not you like operator overloading, I think that the ":="
versus "=" question is reducible to another more basic question and
should be discussed in that light.

Of course, everything in this posting could be wrong.

J Dana Eckart         UUCP: ...!(gatech | pyrdc)!gmu90x!dana
                            ...!pyrdc!nowhere!dana
                  INTERNET: dana@gmu90x.gmu.edu
                     SNAIL: P.O. Box 236/Fairfax, VA  22030-0236