🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <10162@socslgw.csl.sony.JUNET>, diamond@diamond.csl.sony.junet (Norman Diamond) writes:
> In article <9313@dasys1.UUCP> aj-mberg@dasys1.UUCP (Micha Berger) writes:
> >> Consider the following in C, however:
> >
> >>	. . . { T (x); . . . }
> > 
> >> How should the construct be parsed?
> >
> >It would have to be an expression, since anything within brackets ain't a
> >decleration. This isn't Pascal kiddees, all functions are global.
> 
> Anything within brackets is a declaration until the end of
> the declarations, and then statements (expressions) until the closing
> bracket.  This isn't Pascal kiddee; intuition and aesthetics are not
> welcome here.

Well the sataement cannot be a decleration for x, since x is in
parenthasis. It cannot be a decleration for T (using ANSI's new format),
since it has no type.
	My point was about something else. I felt people were trying to force
the statement to read along the same lines as:

	main() {
		int T(x)
		int x;
		{
		};
		.
		.
		.
	}

and that's what I meant about being allowed in Pascal and not in C.

(BTW I've been using C as my primary language since 1978 not because
C is superior as a language, just that it gives me more power to optimize
my code. If I got a Pascal with a good enough optimizer, I'd switch
back. I like C's speed, not the language itself.)
-- 
					Micha Berger				     
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed here are my own. The spelling, noone's.
email: ...!cmcl2!hombre!dasys1!aj-mberg	       Aspaklaria Publications
  vox: (718) 380-7572			       73-32 173 St, Hillcrest, NY 11366