Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #6656Re: Evaluating Programming Languages
From: William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1990 02:11
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1990 02:11
18 lines
1183 bytes
1183 bytes
From icsu8209@caesar.cs.montana.edu (Glassy): > large languages which seem difficult to use because of > 3) sheer humungousness (Ada). You want a BIG language? Try COBOL with its 500 or so keywords; Ada only has 63. By the way, studies have shown (CACM, I forget the exact issue) that there is practically nothing that can be directly trimmed from Ada 83 without fundamentally weakening its capabilities. However, there will probably be a consolidation of the concepts of package and task into the single concept of an object, either in this revision (Ada 9X) or the next. Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7882@hubcap.clemson.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!yale!mintaka!ogicse!emory!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.eduReferences:
<3069@caesar.cs.montana.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!yale!mintaka!ogicse!emory!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 ) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Evaluating Programming Languages Message-ID: <7882@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 5 Feb 90 02:11:55 GMT References: <3069@caesar.cs.montana.edu> Sender: news@hubcap.clemson.edu Reply-To: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu Distribution: usa Lines: 18