Re: :=

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #691

#691

From: Danny Zerkel
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 1989 13:03

12 lines
959 bytes

My personal preference is to spilt these down the middle.

I would use := for assignment and == for comparison.  And not use = at all!
But, I haven't actually worked with a language that does this, so this might
be a bad idea.  I can't help thinking that in a language where assignment
and comparison are equally valid (e.g., C), it would make an obscure sort
of sense to make then symbols as distinct as possible.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Danny J. Zerkel
AT&T Bell Labs
Columbus, OH

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9944@cbnews.ATT.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!dptg!att!cbnews!djz

References: <32861@cornell.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!dptg!att!cbnews!djz
From: djz@cbnews.ATT.COM (Danny Zerkel)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: :=
Keywords: assignment comparison
Message-ID: <9944@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 5 Oct 89 13:03:28 GMT
References: <32861@cornell.UUCP>
Reply-To: djz@cbnews.ATT.COM (Danny Zerkel,45256,cb,1C393,6148605852)
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message