Re: PL/I Grammar

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #730

#730

From: Per Bothner
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 1989 21:42

9 lines
812 bytes

In article <422@cpsolv.UUCP> rhg@cpsolv.uucp (Richard H. Gumpertz) writes:
>      (increment >= 0 ? *index <= limit : *index >= limit) & (BEGIN == END);
> No, the & in the second line shouldn't be an &&.

Could you please explain how && and & could be different in this case?
-- 
	--Per Bothner
Western Software Lab, Digital Equipment, 181 Lytton Ave, Palo Alto CA 94301
bothner@wsl.dec.com ...!decwrl!bothner

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1962@bacchus.dec.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!bothner

References: <2956@usceast.UUCP> <422@cpsolv.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!bothner
From: bothner@decwrl.dec.com (Per Bothner)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: PL/I Grammar
Keywords: PL/I, C, grammar, parser
Message-ID: <1962@bacchus.dec.com>
Date: 22 Oct 89 21:42:23 GMT
References: <2956@usceast.UUCP> <422@cpsolv.UUCP>
Organization: DEC Western Research Lab
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message