Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #853Fortran vs. C vs. comp.lang.misc
From: Jim Giles
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1990 23:18
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1990 23:18
19 lines
1215 bytes
1215 bytes
From article <1990Jan24.204929.6185@cs.rochester.edu>, by ken@cs.rochester.edu (Ken Yap):
> PS: Do you guys think you might take your discussion to the right
> group? It's certainly not very miscellaneous now.
Not at all. The discussion is primarily over certain very important
language design issues which are generally applicable. Just because
the combattants are using C and Fortran as specific examples shouldn't
be allowed to disguise the fact that the issues are more general.
For example:
How should aliasing be implemented in a language?
Fortran doesn't allow it at all (or - not until Fortran 90).
C forces you into aliasing when it's not wanted (eg. array args).
The 'perfect' language would make it available but allow higher
level data structuring tools which allow you to use aliasing
_only_ when it's appropriate.
J. Giles
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<14215@lambda.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!lanl!lambda!jlgReferences:
<1990Jan24.204929.6185@cs.rochester.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!lanl!lambda!jlg From: jlg@lambda.UUCP (Jim Giles) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Fortran vs. C vs. comp.lang.misc Message-ID: <14215@lambda.UUCP> Date: 24 Jan 90 23:18:24 GMT References: <1990Jan24.204929.6185@cs.rochester.edu> Lines: 19