Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #9Re: Robots...
From: Beth Moursund
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:18
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 00:18
9 lines
856 bytes
856 bytes
In article <1992Oct26.093822.24610@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> mouse@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu (der Mouse) writes: >BASIC (which I >assume is what you mean by Basic) is roughly comparable, but more If you're going to be pedantic, make sure you're up to date. :-) Basic is a perfectly legitimate language name. Microsoft no longer sells Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code (BASIC). We now sell Basic. This changed a year or so ago.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct28.001846.22911@microsoft.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!bethmoReferences:
<1992Oct18.131021.1165@kth.se> <1992Oct26.093822.24610@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!bethmo From: bethmo@microsoft.com (Beth Moursund) Subject: Re: Robots... Message-ID: <1992Oct28.001846.22911@microsoft.com> Date: 28 Oct 92 00:18:46 GMT Organization: Microsoft Corporation References: <1992Oct18.131021.1165@kth.se> <1992Oct26.093822.24610@thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu> Keywords: robot screen client Lines: 10