Re: setjmp() (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #942

#942

From: Peter Klausler
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 1990 17:04

11 lines
854 bytes

OOPS! My C code example in a previous posting was quite incorrect; the call
to j() is dead in f() irrespective of the presence of the setjmp. SORRY!

What I MEANT to show was that the presence of setjmp()s and function calls
in a C function implies flow-of-control that isn't explicit in the syntax of
the program. But my example in which this could cause problems in an optimizer
was wrong.

My apologies to all confused by this.

-Peter Klausler @ Cray Computer

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1990Mar22.170422.9437@craycos.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!boulder!pikes!aspen.craycos.com!pmk

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sunybcs!boulder!pikes!aspen.craycos.com!pmk
From: pmk@craycos.com (Peter Klausler)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: setjmp() (was Re: Relationship between C and C++)
Message-ID: <1990Mar22.170422.9437@craycos.com>
Date: 22 Mar 90 17:04:22 GMT
Organization: Cray Computer Corporation
Lines: 11