🚀 go-pugleaf

From article <YEG2TM1xds13@ficc.uu.net>, by peter@ficc.uu.net (Peter da Silva):
> [...]
> So why are you against register windows, which allow you to put more of this
> important resource on a chip without slowing it down by making the register
> address incredibly wide?

I didn't say I was against them.  However, they do make a considerable
number of the registers inaccessable to the programmer at any given point
in the program.  I prefer explicit caches.  That is, 'temp' registers which
can be loaded/stored from the general purpose regs and/or memory by explicit
instructions.  Cray temporary registers are examples of this.  Your register
addresses remain manageably small, you just have a few additional instructions.

J. Giles