Re: Many people's opinions on computer languages

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #5738

#5738

From: Steven Ryan
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 1988 02:06

11 lines
1055 bytes

>>Many have argued that the compiler would be slowed down, or that a many pass
>>compiler would be needed.  Now you are arguing that machine time is not that
>>important.  If execution time is not that important, why should compiler time
>>be any more important?

>Becuase compile times are directly related to programmer productivity.  How
>many times do you sit are your terminal (pc, workstation, whatever) just
>waiting for that 10+ minute (or even 5 minute) compile to finish ?

Well, before I jump in, I would like to see proof that extensible languages
are significantly harder to compile.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1400@garth.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!joyce!sri-unix!garth!smryan

References: <3938@enea.se> <923@l.cc.purdue.edu> <14147@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!lll-lcc!ames!joyce!sri-unix!garth!smryan
From: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Many people's opinions on computer languages
Message-ID: <1400@garth.UUCP>
Date: 13 Sep 88 02:06:20 GMT
References: <3938@enea.se> <923@l.cc.purdue.edu> <14147@agate.BERKELEY.EDU>
Reply-To: smryan@garth.UUCP (Steven Ryan)
Organization: INTERGRAPH (APD) -- Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message