Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #6715Re: Common subexpression optimization
From: Jim Giles
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1990 19:19
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1990 19:19
11 lines
758 bytes
758 bytes
From article <2858@pkmab.se>, by ske@pkmab.se (Kristoffer Eriksson): > [...] > (And if you found the initial assignment to p (p = &a[0][0]) hard to > read, that's no argument against my example, because Jim's should have > read so too. Just saying "p = &a" is wrong. [...] I'll have to look at my example again, but I don't think I said just: "p = &a". What I thought I said was: "p = (int *) &a", which is correct. If I forgot the cast, I apologize. J. Giles
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<14239@lambda.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!lanl!lambda!jlgReferences:
<2858@pkmab.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!lanl!lambda!jlg From: jlg@lambda.UUCP (Jim Giles) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Common subexpression optimization Message-ID: <14239@lambda.UUCP> Date: 13 Feb 90 19:19:22 GMT References: <2858@pkmab.se> Lines: 11