Re: History of := (was: == vs =)

Article View: comp.lang.misc

Article #5144

#5144

From: Peter da Silva
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1988 19:44

15 lines
891 bytes

In article <3921@aw.sei.cmu.edu>, firth@sei.cmu.edu (Robert Firth) writes:
> This
> is because the designers of Algol-60 had the good sense to make it a
> statement language.

a) Why does this show good sense?

b) If I'm not mixing my Algol and PL/1 here, doesn't Algol allow:

	a := if b then c else d;

?
-- 
-- Peter da Silva  `-_-'  ...!hoptoad!academ!uhnix1!sugar!peter
-- Disclaimer: These U aren't mere opinions... these are *values*.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1448@sugar.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nuchat!flatline!sugar!peter

References: <2337@haddock.ISC.COM> <51300003@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> <715@PT.CS.CMU.EDU> <3921@aw.sei.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!nuchat!flatline!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: History of := (was: == vs =)
Message-ID: <1448@sugar.UUCP>
Date: 9 Feb 88 19:44:28 GMT
References: <2337@haddock.ISC.COM> <51300003@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> <715@PT.CS.CMU.EDU> <3921@aw.sei.cmu.edu>
Organization: Sugar Land UNIX - Houston, TX
Lines: 15
Summary: Algol-60 is a statement language?

Reply to Parent Message