Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #3168Re: Dynamic typing (part 3)
From: Wayne Throop
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1991 03:37
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1991 03:37
13 lines
1005 bytes
1005 bytes
- gudeman@cs.arizona.edu (David Gudeman) -] As late as Algol 68, the arguments are mostly about whether -] things can, *in principle*, be compiled; - Yep, psychotic fixation on efficiency. They weren't arguing on - whether something could be _implemented_, they were worried about - producing machine code. It seems clear that David is misinterpreting the above statement. There is NOT a fixation on efficency evident here... the phrase "can, in principle, be compiled" means exactly what David means by "can be implemented" in this context. -- Wayne Throop ...!mcnc!dg-rtp!sheol!throopw
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1492@sheol.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!apple!netcom!amdcad!dgcad!dg-rtp!sheol!throopwReferences:
<1021@optima.cs.arizona.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!apple!netcom!amdcad!dgcad!dg-rtp!sheol!throopw From: throopw@sheol.UUCP (Wayne Throop) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Dynamic typing (part 3) Summary: misinterpreting a phrase Message-ID: <1492@sheol.UUCP> Date: 24 Mar 91 03:37:36 GMT References: <1021@optima.cs.arizona.edu> Lines: 13