🚀 go-pugleaf

Expires:

Sender:

Followup-To:

Distribution:

Keywords:


In article <3921@aw.sei.cmu.edu> firth@bd.sei.cmu.edu.UUCP (Robert Firth) writes:
>Algol-60 does not allow an assignment within an expression, and there
>would be no ambiguity using '=' for both assignment and equality.  This
>is because the designers of Algol-60 had the good sense to make it a
>statement language.  They then used for equality the only reasonable
>symbol, and for assigment they used the left-pointing arrow, to capture
>the notion that something flowed from the RHS to the LHS.

Algol 60 doesn't allow assignments within expressions, but
there would too be an ambiguity, because it allows multiple
assignment:

(1) p :=  q = r
compare q and r, put the answer in p.

(2) p := q := r
put the value of r into q and also into p.

Parsers normally don't use type information to sort out
syntactic ambiguities, so it doesn't really matter if = isn't the
operator for comparing booleans; it is certainly the operator
for something!
I suspect the designers of Algol 60 would have used different
symbols anyway, since they stand for quite different things.
Maybe the statement/expression distinction faded because of a
wish to generalise constructs like the multiple assignment
statement?
-- 
Keith Clarke

UUCP:      keithc@qmc-cs.uucp   or    ...seismo!mcvax!ukc!qmc-cs!keithc
Internet:  keithc@cs.qmc.ac.uk           Post:  Dept of Computer Science
JANET:     keithc@uk.ac.qmc.cs                  Queen Mary College
Easylink:  19019285                             University of London
Telex:     893750 QMCUOL G                      Mile End Road
Fax:       +44 1 981 7517                       London E1 4NS
Voice:     +44 1 980 4811  x3908                England