Article View: comp.lang.misc
Article #3520Re: a < b < c revisited
From: Ken Dickey
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 19:03
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 19:03
14 lines
747 bytes
747 bytes
sommar@enea.se (Erland Sommarskog) writes: >In the autumn of 1989 there was some discussion on the desire >to write a < b < c in various language with the result you >would expect. In general, modern Lisps (e.g. Scheme) behave as you would expect: (< lo-bound x hi-bound) Of course, it is *much* easier to generalize a prefix grammar... -Ken Dickey kend@data.uucp
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<474@data.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!mintaka!ogicse!qiclab!percy!data!kendReferences:
<3195@enea.se>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!mintaka!ogicse!qiclab!percy!data!kend From: kend@data.UUCP (Ken Dickey) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: a < b < c revisited Message-ID: <474@data.UUCP> Date: 15 Apr 91 19:03:41 GMT References: <3195@enea.se> Organization: Microcosm, Beaverton, OR Lines: 14