🚀 go-pugleaf

>In fact, what you are recommending is a constraint on pointers which
>removes one of the _only_ features that I thought pointers were useful
>for.  I already had a pretty low opinion about the value of pointers
>and you are busy destroying what respect I had left.  If it is your
>intent to make pointers seem _less_ useful than they might be, you
>are succeeding.

I must come from a different background than you do.  Where I come from,
pointers are used for things like linked lists, binary trees, etc.
Arrays can be used for this only if you know a priori the ultimate size of
the data structure in question, or if your language allows dynamically
reallocatable arrays.