🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: Little Smalltalk Verion 3
By: Guido van Rossum on Mon, 10 Apr 1989 21:44

syntax and semantics
By: Marc W. Mengel on Mon, 10 Apr 1989 15:24

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Norman Diamond on Mon, 10 Apr 1989 02:14

Re: Syntax vs Semantics (silliness!)
By: Greg Lee on Mon, 10 Apr 1989 13:43

Syntax vs Semantics (silliness!)
By: Garry Wiegand as guest on Mon, 10 Apr 1989 02:44

Re: Little Smalltalk Verion 3
By: Murat N. Konar on Sun, 09 Apr 1989 21:49

Re: C Syntax Again - (anti anti ignorance flame flame)
By: Gordon V. Cormack on Sun, 09 Apr 1989 22:19

Re: Little Smalltalk Verion 3
By: The Cybermat Rider on Sun, 09 Apr 1989 21:40

Re: Little Smalltalk Verion 3
By: Probert on Sun, 09 Apr 1989 20:02

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Rahul Dhesi on Sun, 09 Apr 1989 19:32

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Kenneth Walker on Sun, 09 Apr 1989 18:29

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: David Gudeman on Sun, 09 Apr 1989 15:06

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Chris Torek on Sun, 09 Apr 1989 05:07

help with COBOL
By: James Carter on Thu, 06 Apr 1989 13:39

Little Smalltalk Verion 3
By: Tim Budd on Fri, 07 Apr 1989 22:57

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Michael Condict on Fri, 07 Apr 1989 04:20

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Rahul Dhesi on Fri, 07 Apr 1989 02:07

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Peter da Silva on Thu, 06 Apr 1989 15:49

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Rahul Dhesi on Wed, 05 Apr 1989 16:41

Pascal Plus
By: Dr. Bernat on Mon, 03 Apr 1989 20:23

Re: Language Design
By: Norman Graham on Sat, 01 Apr 1989 00:36

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Marc W. Mengel on Tue, 04 Apr 1989 14:53

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Michael Condict on Tue, 04 Apr 1989 04:39

Re: Language Design
By: Chris Torek on Tue, 04 Apr 1989 04:32

Re: Representation independent languages
By: Ric Holt on Mon, 03 Apr 1989 21:01

Re: Language Design
By: Chris Torek on Sun, 02 Apr 1989 17:01

Representation independent languages
By: Goran Rydquist on Sat, 01 Apr 1989 21:04

Re: Language Design
By: John Woods on Sun, 26 Mar 1989 23:12

C syntax
By: quale on Thu, 30 Mar 1989 17:12

Re: Language Design
By: Clive on Wed, 29 Mar 1989 12:30

Strong vs. weak-typing in OO design/languagges
By: 3929] on Tue, 28 Mar 1989 13:59

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Kenneth Walker on Wed, 29 Mar 1989 03:55

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Chris Torek on Tue, 28 Mar 1989 18:39

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Andrew K. Wright on Tue, 28 Mar 1989 15:17

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Chris Torek on Mon, 27 Mar 1989 17:54

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Chris Torek on Mon, 27 Mar 1989 17:09

Re: Language Design, or: is C's Grammar Context Free
By: Chris Torek on Mon, 27 Mar 1989 16:03

Re: Language Design
By: pa1162 on Sun, 26 Mar 1989 23:09

Info. needed on parsing expressions
By: System Hacker on Sun, 26 Mar 1989 02:01

Re: Language Design
By: Norman Graham on Fri, 24 Mar 1989 22:58

Is C context-free?
By: Gordon V. Cormack on Sat, 25 Mar 1989 01:28

Re: Language Design
By: Theodore Stevens Norvell on Sat, 25 Mar 1989 01:15

Language Specification (was Re: Language Design)
By: Hank Dietz on Fri, 24 Mar 1989 17:34

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Dave Berry on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 16:18

Re: Language Design
By: Steve Vegdahl on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 19:24

Re: Language Design
By: David Gudeman on Fri, 24 Mar 1989 08:24

Re: Language Design
By: Bob Hearn on Fri, 24 Mar 1989 00:12

Context-free grammar. (was Re: Language Design)
By: Aubrey McIntosh on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 16:02

Re: Language Design
By: David Gudeman on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 22:04

Re: Language Design
By: Bob Hearn on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 18:48

BCPL syntax (was: language commenting constructs)
By: Chris Thompson on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 15:53

Re: Language Design
By: Ric Holt on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 14:44

Compilers (once) considered harmful.
By: William G. Hutchison on Wed, 22 Mar 1989 21:07

Re: Language Design
By: Norman Graham on Wed, 22 Mar 1989 07:07

Re: Language Design
By: Bob Hearn on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 02:16

Re: Language Design
By: Dave Jones on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 02:53

Re: Language Design
By: Bob Hearn on Wed, 22 Mar 1989 20:14

(BCPL Syntax) Re: language commenting constructs
By: Peter da Silva on Tue, 21 Mar 1989 21:16

Re: Language Design
By: Dave Jones on Tue, 21 Mar 1989 03:09

Detecting opportunities for parallelism in compilers
By: David P. Lithgow on Tue, 21 Mar 1989 17:32

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Dan Pierson on Tue, 21 Mar 1989 18:38

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Tom Almy on Mon, 20 Mar 1989 16:37

Re: Other syntax issues (was: language commenting constructs)
By: Chris Dollin on Mon, 20 Mar 1989 14:11

FIFTH ANNUAL COMPUTER SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM
By: Steve Wright on Thu, 23 Mar 1989 13:21

Re: Language Design
By: Bob Hearn on Tue, 21 Mar 1989 00:51

Re: Language Design
By: Bob Hearn on Mon, 20 Mar 1989 23:48

Re: Language Design
By: steve on Mon, 20 Mar 1989 17:58

Modula-3 compiler wanted
By: Peter Shirley on Mon, 20 Mar 1989 18:05

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Chris Dollin on Wed, 15 Mar 1989 09:47

Re: Language Design
By: Alan J Rosenthal on Fri, 17 Mar 1989 22:25

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Michael Beede on Sat, 18 Mar 1989 04:42

Re: Language Design
By: Bob Hearn on Fri, 17 Mar 1989 20:50

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Michael Golan on Fri, 17 Mar 1989 16:36

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Robert Firth on Fri, 17 Mar 1989 14:14

Re: Language Design
By: Gordon V. Cormack on Fri, 17 Mar 1989 12:32

Other syntax issues (was: language commenting constructs)
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 17 Mar 1989 01:53

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Jim Giles on Fri, 17 Mar 1989 01:40

commenting summary and response
By: Silver on Fri, 17 Mar 1989 01:25

Language Design
By: wsmith on Thu, 16 Mar 1989 04:57

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Peter da Silva on Thu, 16 Mar 1989 15:56

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Eric Green on Thu, 16 Mar 1989 02:41

Re: language commenting constructs
By: F. L. Charles Seeger III on Wed, 15 Mar 1989 22:57

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Ric Holt on Wed, 15 Mar 1989 13:55

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Gordon V. Cormack on Wed, 15 Mar 1989 04:17

Re: language commenting constructs
By: David Chase on Wed, 15 Mar 1989 01:32

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Jim Giles on Tue, 14 Mar 1989 23:30

Re: language commenting constructs
By: Victor Gavin on Mon, 13 Mar 1989 12:59

language commenting constructs
By: Silver on Sat, 11 Mar 1989 23:24

Re: Program Errors and developement environment
By: Steve Crooks on Fri, 10 Mar 1989 09:53

Re: Motorola -> Unix assembler formatter
By: Marc 'Turn Two' Sabatella on Wed, 08 Mar 1989 16:36

Re: COBOL JOD
By: Julia Rodriguez on Thu, 09 Mar 1989 23:09

Motorola -> Unix assembler formatter
By: The Wizard on Mon, 06 Mar 1989 20:31

COMPUTER LANGUAGE code
By: The Cybermat Rider on Tue, 07 Mar 1989 01:23

Is there a reentrant YACC around?
By: Steve Scot Roy on Tue, 28 Feb 1989 14:26

Re: Program Errors and developement environment
By: Ric Holt on Sat, 04 Mar 1989 15:17

Re: Motorola delimiters (was: Intel Assembly Language)
By: Neil Webber on Thu, 02 Mar 1989 00:10

Re: Copyright status of Turing (and other languages)
By: Ex-God on Wed, 01 Mar 1989 22:29

Re: Copyright status of Turing (and other languages)
By: Jim Cordy on Mon, 27 Feb 1989 16:01

ISO specification language LOTOS / Hippo bugfix
By: Peter van Eijk on Mon, 27 Feb 1989 16:32

Never Assume ! (was Re: Union initialization)
By: Clay Phipps on Tue, 28 Feb 1989 00:48

GNU g++ installation
By: Olafur Thorsteinsson on Tue, 07 Mar 1989 17:10

Copyright status of Turing (and other languages)
By: Charles (Chuck) Houpt on Sun, 26 Feb 1989 21:51

Re: Union initialization
By: Ex-God on Sat, 25 Feb 1989 07:50

Objective-C prices
By: Keith Richards on Wed, 22 Feb 1989 15:43

Re: e-mail address of W.R.Cook and U.Re
By: louwei on Tue, 21 Feb 1989 01:24

e-mail address of W.R.Cook and U.Reddy
By: Diptendu Dutta on Sun, 19 Feb 1989 19:03

Re: "for" loops
By: Chris Torek on Sat, 18 Feb 1989 19:50

PASCAL BNF
By: Jay Roth on Tue, 14 Feb 1989 17:23

Re: Modula-2 Cast Syntax (was Re: What is B&D? (...))
By: Randy Bush on Tue, 14 Feb 1989 05:45

Re: Call by string (was: B&D)
By: Charles Bryant on Wed, 08 Feb 1989 22:15

Re: Structured loops (WAS:Re: Turing programming language.)
By: Charles Lindsey on Fri, 03 Feb 1989 17:50

Re: Modula-2 Cast Syntax (was Re: What is B&D? (...))
By: Clay Phipps on Wed, 08 Feb 1989 01:49

Program Extraction / Calculus of Constructions
By: Dwight Spencer on Tue, 07 Feb 1989 17:52

Re: Modula-2 Cast Syntax (was Re: What is B&D? (...))
By: Ric Holt on Tue, 07 Feb 1989 17:03

Re: Modula-2 Cast Syntax (was Re: What is B&D? (...))
By: Randy Bush on Mon, 06 Feb 1989 17:51

Re: Call by string (was: B&D)
By: David Collier-Brown on Mon, 06 Feb 1989 22:54

Re: Call by string (was: B&D)
By: Frode Odegard on Sat, 04 Feb 1989 16:23

Re: flexible arrays
By: Ken Johnson on Thu, 02 Feb 1989 12:25

Need info re: debuggers for i386-based Unix systems
By: Nash Panju on Tue, 31 Jan 1989 16:23

Re: Call by string
By: Liber on Fri, 03 Feb 1989 03:57

Turbo C & qsort()
By: Scott W. Leonard on Fri, 03 Feb 1989 17:33

Hoare On Data Structuring (Re: flexible arrays)
By: Clay Phipps on Fri, 03 Feb 1989 02:26

Combinator reduction applications?
By: Philip Koopman on Mon, 13 Feb 1989 16:09

Linda information
By: rml on Thu, 02 Feb 1989 15:29

Re: Call by string (was: B&D)
By: Frode Odegard on Wed, 01 Feb 1989 12:36

Re: flexible arrays
By: Udo Hafermann on Wed, 01 Feb 1989 15:45

Re: flexible arrays
By: Marc 'Sphere' Sabatella on Wed, 01 Feb 1989 00:20

Re: Call by string (was: B&D)
By: Nick Pemberton on Wed, 01 Feb 1989 13:05