Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #1010JPI M2 2.00 - PROCEDURE FUNCTIONS & ERROR CHECKING
From: Dominique Willems
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 1990 09:18
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 1990 09:18
26 lines
1447 bytes
1447 bytes
Hi Peter, I have JPI M2 V2.0, as probably you had already guessed... > 3) What is your preference and why? Quite an intriguing dilemma. Especially since it's further complicated by the result_optional switch in the Call pragma. I'd say add another pragma giving you the choice; run-time, compile-time or no checking at all, defaulting to compile-time. Since we already entered the world of more relaxed form-checking, like variable numbers of parameters and optional returns, I don't think another "philosophy-breaking" pragma can do any harm. If you're really a hard-core "no-compromises" Modula programmer, you can just leave all the pragmas alone and default to the standard. What do you think ? Regards, Dominique -- uucp: uunet!m2xenix!puddle!2!295!46.4610!Dominique.Willems Internet: Dominique.Willems@p4610.f46.n295.z2.fidonet.org
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2411.26B332AC@puddle.fidonet.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!nosun!qiclab!m2xenix!puddle!p4610.f46.n295.z2.fidonet.org!Dominique.WillemsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!nosun!qiclab!m2xenix!puddle!p4610.f46.n295.z2.fidonet.org!Dominique.Willems From: Dominique.Willems@p4610.f46.n295.z2.fidonet.org (Dominique Willems) Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: JPI M2 2.00 - PROCEDURE FUNCTIONS & ERROR CHECKING Message-ID: <2411.26B332AC@puddle.fidonet.org> Date: 26 Jul 90 09:18:00 GMT Sender: ufgate@puddle.fidonet.org (newsout1.26) Organization: FidoNet node 2:295/46.4610 - Starline System, Brussels Belgium Lines: 26