Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #1935Re: Two Oberon questionsREAD/NEW/FOLLOWUP
From: Tom Reid x4505
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 13:23
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 13:23
20 lines
1391 bytes
1391 bytes
= For some time now I have been telling my students that Modula-2 removed the = rather pointless Pascal restriction on the type of a function result. I = based this claim on two observations: = (a) the M-2 compiler which I use does allow structured values to be = returned; = (b) Wirth's books on the subject avoid saying anything about it (which, as = above, implies "yes"). = Am I wrong? If so, to whom do I complain? Surely we don't have to go back = to forcing M-2 programmers to memorise the totally artifical distinction = between "structured" and "unstructured". = = Peter Moylan eepjm@cc.newcastle.edu.au = According to Wirth (Programming in Modula-2, 3rd Corrected Edition, p. 56): "2. The result of a function procedure cannot be structured." However, it is not a difficult extension and many compilers have added it (FST is at least one exception). Tom Reid reid@ctc.contel.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9104151323.AA22565@ctc.contel.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!CTC.CONTEL.COM!reidShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!bionet!agate!ucbvax!CTC.CONTEL.COM!reid From: reid@CTC.CONTEL.COM (Tom Reid x4505) Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: Two Oberon questionsREAD/NEW/FOLLOWUP Message-ID: <9104151323.AA22565@ctc.contel.com> Date: 15 Apr 91 13:23:32 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: Modula2 List <INFO-M2%UCF1VM.BITNET@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu> Organization: The Internet Lines: 20