Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #1981Re: New JPI version
From: RoDoGu
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1991 16:48
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 1991 16:48
8 lines
811 bytes
811 bytes
Attention ETH: Why not to define Modula-2++? Why not to standardize OOP in Modula-2? ============================================================================ Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Campus San Luis MEXICO Roberto Dominguez Gutierrez, AL-ISC
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<INFO-M2%91042212560597@UCF1VM.BITNET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uwm.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!VMTECSLP.BITNET!AL281785References:
<editor%ucf1vm.BITNET@LILAC.BERKELEY.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uwm.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!VMTECSLP.BITNET!AL281785 From: AL281785@VMTECSLP.BITNET (RoDoGu) Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: New JPI version Message-ID: <INFO-M2%91042212560597@UCF1VM.BITNET> Date: 22 Apr 91 16:48:21 GMT References: <editor%ucf1vm.BITNET@LILAC.BERKELEY.EDU> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: Modula2 List <INFO-M2%UCF1VM.BITNET@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu> Organization: The Internet Lines: 8