Re: OPERATOR (was: Why no ** operator in Modula2?)

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #2309

#2309

From: Randy Bush
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 1991 16:18

11 lines
833 bytes

In comp.lang.modula2 (aka INFO-MODULA2) you write:

> There are much more problems in this area:
> ...

Thank you!  A bit of rationality in the discussion.

And why are you not on your national Modula-2 standards committee?  We need you
before it becomes Ada-2.

randy

Technical Details

Message-ID: <m0jlN2y-0004XbC@m2xenix.psg.com>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!PSG.COM!randy

References: <MDORMAN1@UA1VM> <INFO-M2%91060605014399@UCF1VM.BITNET>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!PSG.COM!randy
From: randy@PSG.COM (Randy Bush)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: OPERATOR (was: Why no ** operator in Modula2?)
Message-ID: <m0jlN2y-0004XbC@m2xenix.psg.com>
Date: 6 Jun 91 16:18:00 GMT
References: <MDORMAN1@UA1VM> <INFO-M2%91060605014399@UCF1VM.BITNET>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: Modula2 List <INFO-M2%UCF1VM.BITNET@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu>
Distribution: world
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message