Re: Why no ** operator in Modula2?

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #2340

#2340

From: Robert Barton
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1991 05:31

9 lines
984 bytes

In article <TARJEIJ.91Jun18084649@ulrik.uio.no> tarjeij@ulrik.uio.no (Tarjei Jensen) writes:
>I agree that Wirth is onto something. I don't dispute that oberon and modula2
>might be academically sound (you can do anything with them), but I think that
>he has forgotten the programmer. There seems to be very little thought about
>ergonomics (look and feel?) in his programming languages.


  Maybe because Wirth himself is such a poor programmer?  Ever seen the
code he wrote for the simple Pascal compiler?  Ugly to the bone!

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1991Jun19.053127.29333@agora.rain.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!ogicse!intelhf!agora!robart

References: <1717.285A64EB@puddle.fidonet.org> <1663@balrog.ctron.com> <TARJEIJ.91Jun18084649@ulrik.uio.no>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!ogicse!intelhf!agora!robart
From: robart@agora.rain.com (Robert Barton)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: Why no ** operator in Modula2?
Message-ID: <1991Jun19.053127.29333@agora.rain.com>
Date: 19 Jun 91 05:31:27 GMT
References: <1717.285A64EB@puddle.fidonet.org> <1663@balrog.ctron.com> <TARJEIJ.91Jun18084649@ulrik.uio.no>
Organization: Agora
Lines: 9

Reply to Parent Message