Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #2384Re: Why no ** operator in Modula2?
From: Warwick Allison
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1991 04:58
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 1991 04:58
45 lines
1511 bytes
1511 bytes
On a message of 18-Jun-91, Scott McMahan (1:105/42.0) Said:
> To close: Which is better?
>
> WriteString("Amount: ");
> WriteInt(NumberOfThings[1]);
> Write(".");
> WriteLn();
> -or-
> printf("Amount: %d.\n");
> From a programmer's point of view?
In addition to Jon Guthrie's comments,
WriteFormattedInt("Amount: %d.\n", NumberOfThings[1]);
Is perfectly legit Modula-2, providing someone has written the module for it.
It is just that so many C hackers have been bumbling around for so long that
such procedures exist in C.
If you REALLY WANT variable arg counts in M2, write a parameter-passing module.
I think you'd be crazy to use such an abomination of structure.
Warwick.
DEFINITION MODULE VarArgs;
FROM SYSTEM IMPORT BYTE;
PROCEDURE Push(VAR Arg:ARRAY OF BYTE);
PROCEDURE Pop(VAR Arg:ARRAY OF BYTE);
END VarArgs.
beleuch! Looks like C.
--
_-_|\ warwick@cs.uq.oz.au
/ * <-- Computer Science Department,
\_.-._/ University of Queensland,
v Brisbane, AUSTRALIA.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2178@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!brolga!uqcspe!cs.uq.oz.au!warwickReferences:
<3253.28683DC3@puddle.fidonet.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!munnari.oz.au!bunyip.cc.uq.oz.au!brolga!uqcspe!cs.uq.oz.au!warwick From: warwick@cs.uq.oz.au (Warwick Allison) Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Subject: Re: Why no ** operator in Modula2? Message-ID: <2178@uqcspe.cs.uq.oz.au> Date: 27 Jun 91 04:58:11 GMT References: <3253.28683DC3@puddle.fidonet.org> Sender: news@cs.uq.oz.au Reply-To: warwick@cs.uq.oz.au Lines: 45