Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #2424Re: pascal code to modula
From: Prof. P. Terry
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 07:06
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 07:06
15 lines
1295 bytes
1295 bytes
In article <C1Eo1E.473@agora.rain.com> robart@agora.rain.com (Joe Bob) writes: >Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 10:34:26 GMT >In article <cspt.62.727781974@giraffe.ru.ac.za> cspt@giraffe.ru.ac.za (Prof. P. Terry) writes: >>(like some folks are going to believe ISO M-2 is Modula-2?) > > You seem to be implying that you think ISO M-2 will be a step backwards. >In what ways is this the case? (I haven't seen any draft specs since the >one of Jan 1 1990). The proposed ISO M-2 is virtually a Modula-2 derivative (just as TurboPascal is a Pascal derivative). An enormous amount has been added to the language. Opinions may be divided as to whether this is a step backwards or forwards. I recollect that Algol 68 did the same sort of thing to Algol, and who now uses Algol-68?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<cspt.63.728031984@giraffe.ru.ac.za>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psgrain!hippo!cspdt.ru.ac.za!csptReferences:
<8267@kielo.uta.fi> <1993Jan22.163533.8577@psg.com> <cspt.62.727781974@giraffe.ru.ac.za> <C1Eo1E.473@agora.rain.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psgrain!hippo!cspdt.ru.ac.za!cspt From: cspt@giraffe.ru.ac.za (Prof. P. Terry) Subject: Re: pascal code to modula Message-ID: <cspt.63.728031984@giraffe.ru.ac.za> Lines: 16 Sender: news@hippo.ru.ac.za Organization: Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa References: <8267@kielo.uta.fi> <1993Jan22.163533.8577@psg.com> <cspt.62.727781974@giraffe.ru.ac.za> <C1Eo1E.473@agora.rain.com> Distribution: world Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 07:06:24 GMT