Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++)

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #2528

#2528

From: Michel Dagenais
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 10:01

12 lines
1202 bytes

I finally got the exact reference from one of the people posting on this
thread:

Laurie Griffith, "Modula-2 is three times less error prone than C",
Proceedings of the Second International Modula-2 Conference,
Loughborough University of Technology, UK, September 1991, pp 332-338.
--

Prof. Michel Dagenais        http://www.vlsi.polymtl.ca/dagenais/home/home.html
Dept of EE and Computer Eng.        dagenais@vlsi.polymtl.ca
Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal     tel: (514) 340-4029

Technical Details

Message-ID: <DAGENAIS.95Sep22100113@gutrune.vlsi.polymtl.ca>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.polymtl.ca!dagenais

References:

<438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <4395o4$3mv2@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <agurski.811104759@BIX.com> <439uh9$u7@classic.eng.octel.com> <43a5iv$nol@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov> <43t3j4$3e5@toads.pgh.pa.us>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.polymtl.ca!dagenais
From: dagenais@gutrune.vlsi.polymtl.ca (Michel Dagenais)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++)
Date: 22 Sep 95 10:01:13
Organization: Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
Message-ID: <DAGENAIS.95Sep22100113@gutrune.vlsi.polymtl.ca>
References: <438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <4395o4$3mv2@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net>
 <agurski.811104759@BIX.com> <439uh9$u7@classic.eng.octel.com>
 <43a5iv$nol@stc06.ctd.ornl.gov> <43t3j4$3e5@toads.pgh.pa.us>
NNTP-Posting-Host: vlsi.polymtl.ca
In-reply-to: tore@lis.pitt.edu's message of 22 Sep 1995 01:30:11 GMT

Reply to Parent Message