Re: Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++)

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #2534

#2534

From: Karl Kleine
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 09:38

17 lines
1430 bytes

Michel Dagenais (dagenais@gutrune.vlsi.polymtl.ca) wrote:
: I finally got the exact reference from one of the people posting on this
: thread:
: Laurie Griffith, "Modula-2 is three times less error prone than C",
: Proceedings of the Second International Modula-2 Conference,
: Loughborough University of Technology, UK, September 1991, pp 332-338.
: --

Does Laurie Griffith read this newsgroup or does anybody have an email
(if all else fails, a snail mail) address? I think it would be most helpful,
if we could get that paper somehow in PostScript posted here, resp. put
on some ftp server.

--
Prof. Karl Kleine			vkk@rz.uni-jena.de
Fachhochschule Jena			kleine@fzi.de
Postfach 100314, D-07703 Jena, Germany	+49-3641-64-3451/-3453 fax -3449

Technical Details

Message-ID: <445t9s$cml@fsuj01.rz.uni-jena.de>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fsuj50.rz.uni-jena.de!vkk

References: <438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <4395o4$3mv2@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <DAGENAIS.95Sep22100113@gutrune.vlsi.polymtl.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fsuj50.rz.uni-jena.de!vkk
From: vkk@rz.uni-jena.de (Karl Kleine)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++)
Followup-To: comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada
Date: 25 Sep 1995 09:38:04 GMT
Organization: Fachhochschule Jena, Germany
Message-ID: <445t9s$cml@fsuj01.rz.uni-jena.de>
References: <438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <4395o4$3mv2@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <DAGENAIS.95Sep22100113@gutrune.vlsi.polymtl.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: fsuj50.rz.uni-jena.de
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Reply to Parent Message