Re: Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #2543

#2543

From: Matthew Kennel
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 01:28

18 lines
1340 bytes

: >blume@atomic.cs.princeton.edu (Matthias Blume) wrote:
: >>In article <43pi5g$hqc@feynman.comclin.com> glen@comclin.com (Glen Self) writes:
: >>
: >>   >> hello world!
: >>   >>  
: >>   >>    so what's the best language for the 21rst century?
: >>   >>       what's your opinion on Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++?
: >>
: >>   Free form spoken language of the user. No "programming" language
: >>   required.
: >>
: >>
: >>Natural language is hardly the `best' language, because it is too
: >>ambiguous. 

I think this language system is used all the time already in practice.

It's called "graduate student".  ;-)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <44a9ce$3k1@martha.utcc.utk.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!martha.utcc.utk.edu!caffeine!mbk

References:

<BLUME.95Sep20162845@atomic.cs.princeton.edu> <438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <NAYERI.95Sep15120546@tahoe.gte.com> <441101$8gg@sun330.snu.ac.kr> <nelsoni.811882385@rintintin.Colorado.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!martha.utcc.utk.edu!caffeine!mbk
From: mbk@caffeine.engr.utk.edu (Matthew Kennel)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++
Followup-To: comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Date: 27 Sep 1995 01:28:46 GMT
Organization: Oak Ridge National Laboratory and Univ. Tenn.
Message-ID: <44a9ce$3k1@martha.utcc.utk.edu>
References: <BLUME.95Sep20162845@atomic.cs.princeton.edu> <438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <NAYERI.95Sep15120546@tahoe.gte.com> <441101$8gg@sun330.snu.ac.kr> <nelsoni.811882385@rintintin.Colorado.EDU>
NNTP-Posting-Host: caffeine.engr.utk.edu
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Reply to Parent Message