Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #2545Re: Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++)
From: Carsten Whimster
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 13:36
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 13:36
16 lines
1388 bytes
1388 bytes
In article <DFIrI3.K5M@beaver.cs.washington.edu>, Marc E. Fiuczynski <mef@cs.washington.edu> wrote: | Viet-Trung Luu <vluu@napier.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: | >The Modula-n programming languages are pretty good. However, they suffer | >in their Pascal heritage. The C-type syntax is much more concise and | >consistent (no flames please). [snip] | What exactly are you after? An improved syntax? How about Modula-3 with a C syntax? Isn't Java supposed to be like this? Safe, yet C-like? -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Carsten Whimster CS241 Tutor MC1021 x6657 cs241@cayley -------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DFKGHB.85C@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca!cs241References:
<438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <DFI1rr.LyC@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <Pine.SUN.3.91.950926031537.27808B-100000@napier.uwaterloo.ca> <DFIrI3.K5M@beaver.cs.washington.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca!cs241 From: cs241@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (Carsten Whimster) Subject: Re: Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++) Message-ID: <DFKGHB.85C@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> Sender: news@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (news spool owner) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 1995 13:36:46 GMT References: <438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <DFI1rr.LyC@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <Pine.SUN.3.91.950926031537.27808B-100000@napier.uwaterloo.ca> <DFIrI3.K5M@beaver.cs.washington.edu> Nntp-Posting-Host: cayley.uwaterloo.ca Organization: University of Waterloo