Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #2552Re: Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++)
From: Viet-Trung Luu
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 03:30
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 03:30
15 lines
1427 bytes
1427 bytes
On Wed, 27 Sep 1995, Carsten Whimster wrote: > | What exactly are you after? An improved syntax? How about Modula-3 with a C syntax? Sort of... maybe even "basically". And of course, with a few "improvements" (from a C/C++ programmer's point of view). However, sacrificing safety/robustness would be a *bad thing*. > Isn't Java supposed to be like this? Safe, yet C-like? I saw a description of it... it looks to be very interesting. The only problem is in establishing new standards in this world of ours (COBOL is still in use...). - Trung
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.SUN.3.91.950927232823.5434F-100000@lagrange.uwaterloo.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lagrange.uwaterloo.ca!vluuReferences:
<438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <DFI1rr.LyC@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <Pine.SUN.3.91.950926031537.27808B-100000@napier.uwaterloo.ca> <DFIrI3.K5M@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <DFKGHB.85C@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lagrange.uwaterloo.ca!vluu From: Viet-Trung Luu <vluu@lagrange.uwaterloo.ca> Subject: Re: Report on defect in M2 vs C (Was Modula-2, Modula-3, C or C++) Sender: news@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca (news spool owner) Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950927232823.5434F-100000@lagrange.uwaterloo.ca> In-Reply-To: <DFKGHB.85C@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 03:30:45 GMT Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII References: <438nkr$bd@classic.eng.octel.com> <DFI1rr.LyC@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> <Pine.SUN.3.91.950926031537.27808B-100000@napier.uwaterloo.ca> <DFIrI3.K5M@beaver.cs.washington.edu> <DFKGHB.85C@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca> Nntp-Posting-Host: lagrange.uwaterloo.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Organization: University of Waterloo