Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #259Re: Sorts
From: "MARK GOODERUM - UNIV. OF KANSAS...
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1989 18:49
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 1989 18:49
21 lines
1334 bytes
1334 bytes
Good points. Here are some quick notes I looked up last night to add to this discussion. Quick sort has a worse case time of O(n^2) but an average case of O(n log n). Heapsort is both worst and average case O(n log n) times. Quicksorts average times are usually a little better than Heapsort. I should be noted that if often times if you take a set and randomly distribute the order the elements, then you get a random distribution that Quicksort can do in n log n quicker than most algorithms. It should be noted that ANY algorithm for sorting an arbitrary set using only s LessThan comparison can not be quicker than n log n time. If something special is known about the keys, like they are all unique, then times can be improved. If the keys are all unique and can be reduced to a contiguous, ordered sequence, then you can sort in O(n) time. For now, Mark
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<INFO-M2%89091415014312@UCF1VM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UKANVAX!MARKVShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UKANVAX!MARKV
From: MARKV@UKANVAX ("MARK GOODERUM - UNIV. OF KANSAS ACS - MARKV@UKANVAX")
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: Sorts
Message-ID: <INFO-M2%89091415014312@UCF1VM>
Date: 14 Sep 89 18:49:00 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: Modula2 List <INFO-M2%UCF1VM.BITNET@PSUVM.PSU.EDU>
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 21