Re: TopSpeed and assembler (Bug)

Article View: comp.lang.modula2

Article #2726

#2726

From: Scott Cornwall
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1995 14:41

18 lines
1170 bytes

>When you say lack of size checks, do you mean register-register or 
>register-memory operations? I was brought up on DR assemblers, so I'm 
>used to a certain amount of grief :-)

Register-Memory operations are lacking the check. Register-Register 
operations are pretty self evident in x86 assemblers.
   

-----------------------------------------------------
Scott Cornwall              | Fisher & Paykel
Internet cornwall@fp.co.nz  | PSC Section
Compuserve [100032,443]     | P.O. Box 58-223
Fax +64 9 535 0661          | Greenmount
Ph  +64 9 535 0670          | Auckland
                            | New Zealand
Copyright 1995 by Scott Cornwall
-----------------------------------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <cornwall.69.000EB39E@fp.co.nz>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fp.co.nz!ren!THE BLOATED LOG!cornwall

References: <cornwall.68.000EE8E3@fp.co.nz> <DDppqJ.GKG@cix.compulink.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fp.co.nz!ren!THE BLOATED LOG!cornwall
From: cornwall@fp.co.nz (Scott Cornwall)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: Re: TopSpeed and assembler (Bug)
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1995 14:41:59
Organization: Fisher & Paykel PSC
Message-ID: <cornwall.69.000EB39E@fp.co.nz>
References: <cornwall.68.000EE8E3@fp.co.nz> <DDppqJ.GKG@cix.compulink.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pscsc1.fp.co.nz
X-Newsreader: Trumpet for Windows [Version 1.0 Rev A]

Reply to Parent Message