🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.lang.modula2
Article #2773

TopSpeed Modula-2

#2773
From: Christopher Holko
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 16:29
18 lines
1135 bytes
Question folks,

I used to use Top Speed Modula-2 about 2-3 years ago,  I stopped with
version 2.1 or something like that.  The big reason I stopped
developing in M2 was the lack of libraries where the code was
available without paying an arm and a leg for it.

I also stopped using TS because I accidently bought their COM tool kit
which used no assembly,  and looked very much like a TP toolkit I had
received shareware.  (they claimed their compiler was so good you did
not need the interrupt coded in assembly..  posted right on their
support board...)

If I were to get back into M2 what would be a good compiler to choose?
I would love to find an easy way to program OS/2,  as I am not a big
fan of Windows. (esp 95.. object oriented in their dreams)

Chris
Technical Details
Message-ID: <42cljo$nme@firehose.mindspring.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!matlock.mindspring.com!usenet

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!matlock.mindspring.com!usenet
From: cholko@mindspring.com (Christopher Holko)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
Subject: TopSpeed Modula-2
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 1995 16:29:22 GMT
Organization: MindSpring Enterprises
Message-ID: <42cljo$nme@firehose.mindspring.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cholko.mindspring.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82